Society, digital culture, and affordance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33010/ie_rie_rediech.v15i0.1915Keywords:
Affordances, digital culture, digital narratives, digital rethoric, digital technologyAbstract
The following text reflects on three key aspects: digital culture, digital rhetoric, and the relationship between social ecosystems (or complex systems) and affordances, understood as an arrangement or environmental design for the specific practices of different topics in societies. The proposal of this text is that digital rhetoric should study firstly the relationship on how we read, name, and inhabit the world in the context of body deterritorialization and digital relocation. This establishes an ethos, while digital narratives articulate the construction of complex social ecosystems. From the ground, the affordances allow and had re-localized the very mindset of societies, generating from educational spaces the digital culture understood as digital skills. Digital culture is not referred to a capital of “digital culture”, but to different epistemic, ethical, and reading practices of the world. Therefore, digital culture is not extraordinary, but rather an everyday occurrence.
References
Bell, D., y Kennedy, B. M. (2000). The cybercultures reader. Psychology Press.
Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. MIT Press.
Bolter, J. D. (2001). Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print. Routledge.
Boyd, D., y Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. University of California Press.
Bustamante, E. (2011). Cultura digital: la ‘nueva’ cultura clásica. Telos. Cuadernos de Comunicación e Innovación, (88), 59-64. https://www.fundaciontelefonica.com/arte_cultura/publicaciones-listado/pagina-item-publicaciones/itempubli/256/
Clark, A. (2001). Natural-born cyborgs? En M. Baynon, C. L. Nehaniv y K. Dautenhahn (eds.), Cognitive technology: Instruments of mind (pp. 17-24). Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F3-540-44617-6.pdf
Clark, A., y Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8284.00096
Davisson, A., y Leone, A. (2018). From coercion to community building. En A. Hess y A. Davisson (eds.), Theorizing digital rhetoric (pp. 85-97). Routledge.
De Souza, A. (2006). From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture, 9(3), 261-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331206289022
De Silva, A., y Frith, J. (2012). Mobile interfaces in public spaces: Locational privacy, control, and urban sociability. Routledge.
Eyman, D. (2015). Digital rhetoric: Theory, method, practice. University of Michigan Press.
Farias-Gaytan, S., Aguaded, I., y Ramirez-Montoya, M. S. (2023). Digital transformation and digital literacy in the context of complexity within higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 386. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01875-9
Fernández Utrera, M. S. (2006). Ciberculturas, hispanismos y tecnología digital en el nuevo milenio. Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos, 31(1), 3-28. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/160384
Fisher, W. R. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communications Monographs, 51(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390180
Foss, S., y Griffin, C. (1995). Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communications Monographs, 62(1), 2-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376345
Gaos, J. (2000). La filosofía en la universidad. En Obras completas. UNAM.
Gibson, J. (1979). The theory of affordances. En The ecological approach to visual perception (pp. 127-137). Houghton Mifflin.
Gurak, L. (1997). Persuasion and privacy in cyberspace: The online protests over Lotus Marketplace. Yale University Press.
Gurak, L. J. (2001). Cyberliteracy: Navigating the Internet with awareness. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490269807a
Gurak, L. J., y Antonijevic, S. (2009). Digital rhetoric and public discourse. En A. Lunsford, K. Wilson y R. Eberly (eds.), The Sage handbook of rhetoric (pp. 497-508). Sage.
Han, B. C. (2012). La sociedad de la transparencia. Herder.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and eomen: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
Hess, A. (2018). Introduction: Theorizing digital rhetoric. En A. Hess y A. Davisson (eds.), Theorizing digital rhetoric (pp. 17-32). Routledge.
Landow, G. P. (1994). Hyper/Text/Theory. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lanham, R. A. (1992). Digital rhetoric: Theory, practice, and property. En M. Tuman (ed.), Literacy online: The promise (and peril) of reading and writing with computers (pp. 221-243). University of Pittsburgh Press.
Lanham, R. A. (1993). The electronic word: Democracy, technology, and the arts. University of Chicago Press.
Leone, A. C., y Davisson, A. (2018). From coercion to community building: Technological affordances as rhetorical forms. En A. Hess y A. Davisson (eds.), Theorizing digital rhetoric (pp. 101-113). Routledge.
Lévy, P. (2007). Cibercultura: informe al Consejo de Europa. Anthropos Editorial.
Losh, E. M. (2009). Virtualpolitik: An electronic history of government media-making in a time of war, scandal, disaster, miscommunication, and mistakes. The MIT Press.
Lyotard, J. F. (1996). La condición postmoderna. Cátedra.
McKerrow, R. (1989). Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis. Communications Monographs, 56(2), 91-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758909390253
Moulthrop, S. (1994). Rhizome and resistance: Hypertext and the dreams of a new culture. En G. P. Landow (ed.), Hyper/text/theory (pp. 299-319).
Murray, J. H. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck. The future of narrative in cyberspace. The MIT Press.
Nadkarni, S., y Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71, 233-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7
Osborn, M. (1967). Archetypal metaphor in rhetoric: The light-dark family. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 53(2), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335636709382823
Parejo Mota, J. (2011). Cultura y sociedad digital. Once aforismos (más bien hipótesis) sobre una vida digital. Abaco: Revista de Cultura y Ciencias Sociales, (68), 98-101. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/291634
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin.
Pfister, D. S. (2014). Networked media, networked rhetorics: Attention and deliberation in the early blogosphere. Penn State University Press.
Porter, J. E. (2009). Recovering delivery for digital rhetoric. Computers and Composition, 26(4), 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.09.004
Rabinovitz, L., y Geil, A. (2004). Memory bytes: History, technology, and digital culture. Duke University Press.
RAE [Real Academia Española] (2014). Diccionario de la lengua española (23a. ed.).
Reddy, P., Chaudhary, K., y Hussein, S. (2023). A digital literacy model to narrow the digital literacy skills gap. Heliyon, 9(4).
Schulte, S. R. (2008). State technology to state of being: The making of the internet in global popular culture (1980-2000) [Tesis de Doctorado]. The George Washington University. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 3311406. https://search.proquest.com/docview/89249348?accountid=14598
Snyder, K. (2005). The digital culture and communication: More than just classroom learning. Seminar.net - International Journal of Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 1(2), 1-9. http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/021/vol2/020/ecp2107v2020.pdf
Sunstein, C. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton University Press.
Sunstein, C. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.
Vaidhyanathan, S. (2012). The Googlization of everything (and why we should worry). University of California Press.
Warnick, B. (2018). Rhetorical criticism of public discourse on the Internet: Theoretical implications. En J. Gunn y D. Davis (eds.), Fifty years of Rhetoric Society Quarterly: Selected readings, 1968-2018 (pp. 98-109). Routledge.
Welch, K. (1999). Electric rhetoric: Classical rhetoric, oralism, and a new literacy. MIT Press.
Zallo, R. (2011). Civilización y vida social. Paradojas de la cultura digital. Telos. Cuadernos de Comunicación e Innovación, (88), 103-106. https://www.fundaciontelefonica.com/arte_cultura/publicaciones-listado/pagina-item-publicaciones/itempubli/256/
Zappen, J. P. (2005). Digital rhetoric: Toward an integrated theory. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 319-325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1403_10
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ismene Ithaí Bras Ruiz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
